Thursday, April 24, 2014

Truck falls into metro pit, kills 2 workers

Truck plunges into metro rail pit, kills 2
Times of India, Hyderabad, 18 April 2014
Hyderabad: Two L&T metro rail workers died and a driver suffered injuries on Thursday when a ready-mix truck fell into a trench dug for the construction of a pier (pillar) at Nalgonda X Roads.
    The mishap occurred at 3.20 am when the ready-mix concrete truck (AP 16 TD 4445) coming from Dachepally crashed through the barriers and fell into a pit dug for construction of the metro rail pillar. Four workers were inside the pit and the vehicle directly fell on two of them. Both workers — Mumtaz Ansari, 23, and Babul Yadav, 19, hailing from Jharkhand — died on the spot. Two other workers in the pit escaped unhurt. Just minutes before the incident, six of the 10 workers in the pit had climbed out to get a drink of water. 
    Truck driver Komaraiah from Mahbubnagar, who also suffered injuries, was admitted to the Osmania General Hospital. His condition is said to be out of danger. 
    Though the accident occurred at 3.20 am, it took more than eight hours for the police to pull out the bodies from the spot. Police initially requisitioned five small cranes to pull out the truck from the pit, but could not lift the heavy truck. Finally, a 180-tonne heavy crane was brought to the spot and at 11.45 am, the truck was pulled out from the pit and the bodies recovered.
    Due to the accident, traffic on the busy Chaderghat-Malakpet route moved at a snail’s pace till afternoon.

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Half of Iskcon temple to be razed by Hyderabad Metro

After showing sheer arrogance and utter disregard to the historic heritage buildings of Hyderabad city, the Hyderabad Metro Rail (HMR) authorities appear to be adamant on demolishing at least half of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (Iskcon), Secunderabad temple (Near Sangeet theatre) on Corridor-3. HMR proposes to acquire 1,600 square yards of land of the 100-year old temple. HMR now says 900 sq.yrd only will be affected. The temple complex will get totally ruined and lose all the charm of a cultural place with the metro pillars inside its complex and the gigantic corridor viaduct going right over the temple.
Iskcon temple officials and devotees have protested against the arbitrary nature of the HMR and its arrogance. They have proposed an alternative in consultation with railway engineers. They stressed that this alternative “was designed by a panel consisting of top railway (SCR) engineers, headed by the chief engineer himself. There were 10 members in the panel”. In the picture given below, the shaded rectangular area is the temple premises, the red lines are the existing proposal of the HMR and the yellow lines are the proposed alternative by Iskcon as per the advise of the railway engineers. By following the alternative, there will be no difference to the demolition of other buildings and, more importantly, the temple will be saved.

Our View: The present controversy is due to the total lack of transparency and public consultation on the routes of the HMR in the city. Such controversies arose at several places – Sultan Bazaar-Badi Chawdi-Koti, Ameerpet-Yousufguda-Krishnanagar, Regimental Bazaar, Nampally etc. The HMR and GHMC authorities have displayed utter lack of sensitivity and more of arrogance. They appear to be eager to serve the private interests of the L&T than the public cause. Already the Govt of AP has given more lands, worth hundreds of crores, to L&T than what are specified in the Concession Agreement.
The alternative curve proposed by the Iskcon with the advise of the railway engineers should be followed by the HMR. If they claim that the curve is not conducive for the trains to negotiate, we would like to remind them that from Greenlands to JHills Checkpost, there are at least seven L-shared curves. Till now the HMR and L&T have not disclosed to the public about the designs of the metro at these curves. Therefore, the HMR’s claims cannot be trusted.
We extend our support to the Iskcon temple authorities in their fight to save the temple.
-------------------
The following weblinks (developed by the Iskcon officials) gives the details of the existing and proposed curves:
This is the link wherein they explain what would happen if they dont take ISKCON temple land. This is a completely bogus alternative. Railway engineers had a good laugh. 
Here is what we are proposing:
You would find all information here.
-----------------

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

FIR against L&T by the NHAI

 An FIR has been filed against the L&T Metro, which is constructing Hyderabad metro rail (HMR), in Sanathnagar police station (Hyderabad). L&T and HMR have been behaving as law unto themselves. Their highhanded attitude over other departments in the govt has been a talking point for sometime in the official circles. Now the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has filed this FIR. L&T has been recklessly violating the existing rules and practices in road widening and road laying, and taking up the metro works along the highways (Eenadu, 22 Jan, Hyd city edition). He is the link to the news item: http://eenadu.net/district/inner.aspx?dsname=Hyderabad&info=hyd-panel1 
It is not a small issue that a central govt agency files an FIR against L&T. People who are travelling along the metro construction routes have been experiencing nightmares in traffic jams, spoiled roads, lack of traffic police to guide etc. At most of the spots where the soil test were done, badly laid and rough patches have been left out creating a serious nuisance and a hazard for the vehicles. And, in Hyderabad, nobody questions the metro people. Because it is big project.

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

Happy New Year 2014



Dear all,
I wish all the social activist a very Happy and Successful New Year. Hope our struggles bear fruit in strengthening democracy and accountability in governance. The victory of AAP in Delhi and its forthcoming expansion all over India provide immense hope in this direction. I, on my part at Hyderabad, will continue to expose the Hyderabad's elevated metro rail project. I will be continuously seeking the support of the fellow activists in the city and elsewhere in this purpose.
With best regards,
Dr. C. Ramachandraiah
The two photos below were taken when a group of geography students visited Hyderabad in December 2013 as part of their study tour. They were already aware of our campaign on this project and also this blog. I gave them first a presentation in my Centre, clarified all kinds of doubts, and later took them on a field visit to Sultan Bazaar which is a heritage area. See some posts on this blog to know their fight against the metro project. The students were surprised to see how vibrant the bazaar was and were wondering how can any civilised government demolish such a bazaar.


Friday, December 13, 2013

Hyderabad metro breaks Manjira water pipeline

The following news item refers to the breaking of a 1000 mm diametre main pipeline carrying drinking water to Hyderabad city by the metro construction near Moosapet. For several hours the water gushed out and flooded the area.At the time it was broken by the drilling, there was an estimated flow of 3000 cubic metres per hour. Due to this break down, water supply has been stopped today in several localities (Eenadu, 13 Dec, 2013).
(It may be recalled that the L&T company, which bagged the metro contract, has been conducting soil tests for the last three years along the metro corridors. This incident proves how inefficient the L&T has been in undertaking the works in a scientific manner.)


Friday, November 22, 2013

Who will pay the loans of Delhi Airport Line metro


Who will repay loans for Delhi airport Metro, Reliance or DMRC?
Author(s): Anupam Chakravartty Date:Nov 20, 2013
A consortium of banks led by Axis Bank and India Infrastructure Finance Company (IIFC) has slapped legal notices on Delhi Airport Metro Express Line (DAMEL), a private-public partnership between Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) and Reliance-Infra, for non-payment of bank loans. The project has turned into a non-performing asset. This comes as a double blow for DAMEL, which is already engaged in a legal dispute between DMRC and Reliance-Infra.
DAMEL carries a little over 10,000 commuters between Shivaji Stadium and Dwarka, and halts at the Indira Gandhi International Airport to help commuters avoid traffic. But DAMEL now has nobody to take responsibility for its liabilities.
According to DMRC, which is now operating the airport Metro line, the 54:46 partnership between Reliance-Infra and DMRC failed to pay interest for the loans from the consortium of banks since March 2013. Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited (DAMEPL) borrowed Rs 1,800 crore from Axis Bank-led consortium and Rs 350 crore from UK-based IIFC after the company bagged the contract in 2009. DMRC spokesperson issued a statement that liability to pay interest for the loan rests with DAMEPL even though Reliance Infra has invoked the termination clause to the agreement.
On the other hand, Reliance-Infra issued a statement that its concessionaire DAMEPL “has terminated the Concession Agreement through termination notice dated October 8, 2012, owing to DMRC’s Event of Default.”  It further stated that DMRC has already taken over the entire project with effect from July 1, this year with all existing contracts, employees from DAMEPL. Since July 1, DMRC has been collecting all the revenues while the arbitration proceedings are going on under Railway Board.
Earlier this year, the Comptroller Auditor General of India had pointed out that Reliance-Infra has diluted its stake in the concessionaire, a charge strongly refuted by Reliance Infra (see ‘Profitable Exit’). Since 2012, DAMEL operations came to standstill until January 2013 when Reliance-Infra pointed out some serious structural defects in the Metro line owing to which DAMEL trains had to slow down. While DMRC claims the faults were repaired, Reliance-Infra wanted to back out of the project citing losses.

Friday, November 8, 2013

Lies and half-truths of Metro MDs on Land Robbery

Citizens for a Better Public Transport in Hyderabad
(A coalition of civil society organizations and individuals)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                 8 November 2013.
Press Release
Hyderabad Metro Rail Project
We Refute the Lies of NVS Reddy & VB Gadgil on Land Robbery
It appeared in the media today that the MDs of HMR and L&T Metro, Mr. NVS Reddy and V.B Gadgil are reported to have said that they have not taken an inch of excess land for the metro, and in fact there is still a shortfall of 22 acres or so.
We would like to reiterate that they have already taken 71 acres of excess lands which are not mentioned in the Concession Agreement. We challenge them to disclose the full details and put up the same in their websites. We are prepared for a public debate on this. This is nothing but a daylight robbery of precious public lands worth thousands of crores of rupees. We are talking about the land details listed in pages 179-80 of the Agreement and not about the lands meant for depots and maintenance at Nagole, Miyapur and Falaknuma. They are trying to hoodwink the people by covering up these issues, and only talk about the completing of the Nagole-Mettuguda stretch etc. etc.

NVS Reddy says that those who have been making allegations in the last five years have not proved anything. In fact it is the other way round. All allegations made by us have been proved. The fact that NVS Reddy refuses to appear on a common platform with us for a debate itself is a proof of our correctness in this.
1. We would like remind NVS Reddy and the public that the Order of Justice L. Narasimha Reddy of AP High Court in March 2012 justifies our position that there is no transparency in this project. We quote from the Order:
-          “The effort of the HMR appears to be, to shield or immunise itself from any plausible objections, and unfortunately the State, in its anxiety to spread a red-carpet to a private agency, has chosen to violate and break the law, enacted by itself.”
-          “there is a serious lacunae in the very launching of the project, under the A.P. Tramways Act; though it is almost a full-fledged railway.”…”it is totally impermissible to establish a ‘Railway’, in name, structure and purport, under A.P. Tramways Act.”
-          “Metro Rail was granted on earlier occasion in favour of an agency, in a similar clandestine manner, keeping the entire project away from public scrutiny.” 
-          “Acceptance of the contention of the respondents would lead to disastrous consequences. A scheme, which involves transfer of vast extents of Government land, acquisition of large number of private properties, dislocation of the road transport system for a considerable time, conferring of the largesse of a high magnitude upon a private agency, cannot take place without reference to any public opinion.”
2.  We would like to question the two MDs how they are going to provide parking and circulation for stations in those places where Osmania University refused to part with lands? How are the passengers in those areas going to benefit with the lands given at Raidurg?
3. Why should the public ask for every small information through RTI which NVS Reddy is suggesting? This itself shows the high-handed attitude of the metro MD. On one hand, they are claiming this project to be the most advanced technologically but, on the other hand, they don’t want to put the important details like Concession Agreement, DPRs, land allocations and station designs on their websites. This itself shows how dubious their claims and methods are.
4. They are only talking about the lands of Old Gandhi Hospital and at Raidurg as compensation for the OU lands. This is only a half-truth. What about the 2 acres of land of Water Board at Yousufguda, 8 acres at Erramanjil, 10.25 acres of GHMC lands/properties, 17 acres of HMDA, and small amounts of lands at a few other places. These are not part of the Agreement. If not land robbery, what else is it?
5. The MDs are claiming that the project design was finalized in the pre-bidding stage itself, hence it cannot go underground at this stage near heritage buildings. If so, we would like to question them why they are not sticking to pre-bid design and are changing the alignment of Line 2 towards Old Gandhi Hospital and extending the Line 3from Shilparamam to Raidurg? Nearly 25 acres of lands are taken at these two places only.
That means, the two MDs have no problems with pre-bid designs and are willing to make changes to grab prime lands but will not do so to protect the historic heritage precincts. If not hypocrisy and malicious intentions, what else is it?

6. We would like to appeal to Shri KCR and TRS party that if they are serious about protecting the heritage of the city, they need not wait for the metro to be completed and then demolish it. If they are sincere about their claims, they should demolish the piers NOW in front of the Public Garderns.
 If the two MDs are serious about establishing the transparency in the dealings of this project, we demand that they put up in their websites all the details regarding –
-          Concession Agreement,
-          Detailed Project Reports,
-          Lands promised in the Agreement and lands allocated along with the location and extent, 
-          Complete designs of all the metro stations along the three corridors (this project is known to have got the best design award globally but the designs for several crucial metro stations are not even ready),
-          Complete designs of the intersections of the Corridors with one another at three places.
If there is transparency and honesty in the affairs of the project there is no need to indulge in publicity gimmicks by organizing competitions in the name of “pick a click”, “Brand Ambassadors”, metro coach exhibition  etc. to hoodwink the public especially the youth and students.
We would like to advise the so-called “brand ambassadors” to read the Concession Agreement and understand it before competing in these events. Otherwise, they would be spreading only lies and become pawns in the hands of the metro authorities.
This is an externally shining project like “medi pandu” but, if opened, a lot of muck will come out.
Sd/-
Dr. C. Ramachandraiah, Social Scientist, Convenor, Citizens for Better Public Transportation
in Hyderabad (Mobile: 94400 35405).
Mr. S. Jeevan Kumar, State President, Human Rights Forum, Andhra Pradesh
Mr. B. Ramakrishna Raju, State Convenor, National Alliance of Peoples Movements (NAPM), A.P.
Mr O.M. Debara, General Secretary, Forum for a Better Hyderabad.